Update gitlab to 8.6
Created by: Sudheeshshetty
We have 22 packages to update.
@balasankarc @rahulkrishnanfs @isaagar @pravi @bhi . Below are the list of gems that needs to be packaged.Start Packaging.
Refer this. http://debian.fosscommunity.in/status/?appname=gitlab&sort=satisfied
-
request_store | ~> 1.2.0 | 1.3.0-1 -WIP @sudheeshshetty -
actionview | = 4.2.6 | 2:4.2.5.2-2 -
rugged | ~> 0.24.0 | 0.23.2+ds1-1+b3 -
http_parser.rb | ~> 0.5.1 | 0.6.0-3+b3 - This version probably worked with previous version of GitLab. We need not downgrade -
gollum-rugged_adapter | ~> 0.4.2 | 0.4.1-2 -
premailer | >= 1.7.9, ~> 1.7 | NA -
encryptor | ~> 3.0.0 | 2.0.0-1 - WIP @sudheeshshetty -
fog | ~> 1.36.0 | 1.34.0-3 -
grape-entity | ~> 0.4.2 | 0.5.0-1 - This version probably worked with previous version of GitLab. We need not downgrade -
activemodel | = 4.2.6 | 2:4.2.5.2-2 -
fog-core | ~> 1.36 | 1.32.1-1 @rahulkrishnanfs -
omniauth-auth0 | ~> 1.4.1 | NA - WIP @sudheeshshetty -
gitlab_omniauth-ldap | ~> 1.2.1 | 1.0.5-1 -
sawyer | >= 0.5.3, ~> 0.7.0 | 0.6.0-2 - Done by @sudheeshshetty . In alioth. -
activejob | = 4.2.6 | 2:4.2.5.2-2 -
ace-rails-ap | ~> 2.0.1 | 3.0.3-2 - This version probably worked with previous version of GitLab. We need not downgrade -
gollum-grit_adapter | ~> 1.0 | 0.4.1-2 -
gitlab-grit | >= 2.7.1, ~> 2.7 | 2.5.0-3 - Done. Need rugged to be updated first. -
github-markup | ~> 1.4.0 | 1.3.3+dfsg-1 - @balasankarc -
premailer-rails | ~> 1.9.0 | NA -
gitlab_git | ~> 10.0 | 8.2.0-2 - @balasankarc -
simple_oauth | ~> 0.1.4 | 0.3.1-2 - This version probably worked with previous version of GitLab. We need not downgrade
Imported comments:
By Praveen Arimbrathodiyil on 2016-06-11T11:01:11.189Z
@bhi I have just uploaded ruby-excon, thanks!
By Praveen Arimbrathodiyil on 2016-06-11T10:25:10.641Z
@bhi also change the distribution from UNRELEASED in changelog when it is ready for upload.
By Praveen Arimbrathodiyil on 2016-06-11T10:17:42.012Z
@bhi did you confirm is all reverse dependencies (apt-cache rdepends ruby-excon) are compatible with the new version?
By Abhijith PA on 2016-06-10T15:01:26.129Z
@pravi , yes, but if we get that test right, thats better.
RFS pushed all the local commits of excon. I think its ready ,can you upload it
By Praveen Arimbrathodiyil on 2016-06-09T04:12:08.517Z
@bhi we decided to comment out that test and proceed, right?
By Abhijith PA on 2016-06-09T02:25:37.961Z
@sudheeshshetty , ruby-excon test is freezing at some point. Can you take a look.
By Sudheeshshetty on 2016-06-08T17:14:01.132Z
@pravi ok.
By Praveen Arimbrathodiyil on 2016-06-08T17:07:57.253Z
@sudheeshshetty , that is already taken by @bhi
By Sudheeshshetty on 2016-06-08T17:04:14.163Z
@pravi taking ruby-excon and upgrading it.
By Praveen Arimbrathodiyil on 2016-06-07T09:10:07.656Z
@bhi I closed ruby-email-reply-parser bug as I could not reproduce it as well.
@sudheeshshetty @bhi I think ruby-fog-core needs ruby-excon update
By Abhijith PA on 2016-05-17T08:10:50.373Z
@sudheeshshetty @balasankarc @isaagar @praveen @rahulkrishnanfs ruby-email-reply-parser is failing to build from source . * https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=822980 . I built with pbuilder and it went fine. Can you guys check it ?
By Sudheeshshetty on 2016-05-13T05:00:32.323Z
@bhi I remember sending a RFS for ruby-fog-core. I don't remember for which version it is. I will check later and reply.
By Abhijith PA on 2016-05-12T13:42:25.199Z
@sudheeshshetty ,Please send RFS for ruby-fog-core to mailinglist
By Abhijith PA on 2016-05-12T09:09:58.278Z
@sudheeshshetty , Make debian/1.4.1-1 tag in alioth
By Abhijith PA on 2016-05-12T09:07:00.049Z
Marked the task omniauth-auth0 | ~> 1.4.1 | NA - WIP @sudheeshshetty as completed
By Abhijith PA on 2016-05-12T08:54:52.601Z
@rahulkrishnanfs , send RFS . I think praveen is busy with campaigning .
Did you check the rdepends of ruby-fog ?
By Rahulkrishnan R A on 2016-05-09T02:07:06.427Z
@bhi I updated the ruby-fog
By Abhijith PA on 2016-04-23T15:18:56.761Z
@pravi , omniauth-ldap (ruby-omniauth-ldap)
and gitlab_omniauth-ldap(not in alioth)
are kind of same. Latest upstream( which is 1.0.5
) of omniauth-ldap is in unstable.
My question is do we need to create to a new directory for gitlab_omniauth-ldap
in alioth or pull new upstream version of gitlab_omniauth-ldap to omniauth-ldap
?
By Abhijith PA on 2016-04-23T13:22:48.342Z
@rahulkrishnanfs Are you working on ruby-fog ?
By Abhijith PA on 2016-04-23T13:17:39.240Z
@praveen , What is the problem with gollum-grit-adapter ? #807326
By Praveen Arimbrathodiyil on 2016-04-13T19:26:37.645Z
@balasankarc sonic pi does not mention any version requirement for rugged. So I think it should be fine.
By Balasankar C on 2016-04-13T18:15:50.963Z
@pravi RFS: ruby-premailer-rails
By Balasankar C on 2016-04-13T18:15:34.140Z
Marked the task premailer-rails | ~> 1.9.0 | NA as completed
By Balasankar C on 2016-04-13T17:49:11.839Z
Marked the task premailer | >= 1.7.9, ~> 1.7 | NA as completed
By Balasankar C on 2016-04-13T17:47:12.053Z
@pravi RFS: ruby-premailer
By Balasankar C on 2016-04-13T17:13:35.846Z
@pravi RFS: gollum-rugged_adapter
By Balasankar C on 2016-04-13T17:12:57.575Z
Marked the task gollum-rugged_adapter | ~> 0.4.2 | 0.4.1-2 as completed
By Balasankar C on 2016-04-13T17:09:19.694Z
Seems you skipped build in chroot step or you'd have realized these already :)
Of course I skipped the build in chroot, because I knew it won't be satisfied. Giving unstable as distribution was a mistake I made out of routine. :)
PS : About rugged, sonic-pi-server is the only thing left and I had initiated a mail thread with the maintainer, CCying you. Hope you got it.
By Praveen Arimbrathodiyil on 2016-04-13T16:47:37.050Z
@balasankarc ruby-sawyer 0.6 is already in the archive.
By Praveen Arimbrathodiyil on 2016-04-13T16:46:19.984Z
Marked the task rugged | ~> 0.24.0 | 0.23.2+ds1-1+b3 as completed
By Sudheeshshetty on 2016-04-13T16:22:09.558Z
@pravi sent RFS for fog-core
By Sudheeshshetty on 2016-04-13T16:00:37.192Z
taking fog-core
By Praveen Arimbrathodiyil on 2016-04-13T13:43:55.975Z
@balasankarc uploaded ruby-github-markup
By Praveen Arimbrathodiyil on 2016-04-13T08:02:32.497Z
@balasankarc did you test gitlab 8.5 already in unstable with ruby-gitlab-git 10.0? When a major version is released, it is likely to introduce incompatible changes. It is better to upload it to experimental and move all gitlab 8.6 dependencies together to unstable so as not to break existing 8.5. For minor updates to stable libraries, we can upload directly to unstable. Also rugged 0.24 is still in experimental so its not ready for unstable anyway. Also minimum version of rugged was not updated in control. Seems you skipped build in chroot step or you'd have realized these already :) Uploaded after making these changes.
By Praveen Arimbrathodiyil on 2016-04-13T07:28:33.892Z
Marked the task encryptor | ~> 3.0.0 | 2.0.0-1 - WIP @sudheeshshetty as completed
By Balasankar C on 2016-04-13T05:02:19.650Z
Marked the task sawyer | >= 0.5.3, ~> 0.7.0 | 0.6.0-2 - Done by @sudheeshshetty . In alioth. as completed
By Balasankar C on 2016-04-13T05:01:35.408Z
@praveen RFS: ruby-sawyer
By Balasankar C on 2016-04-13T04:50:37.787Z
@praveen RFS: ruby-gitlab-git
By Balasankar C on 2016-04-13T04:48:50.685Z
@praveen RFS: ruby-github-markup
By Sudheeshshetty on 2016-04-05T17:48:21.209Z
taking encryptor
By Praveen Arimbrathodiyil on 2016-04-03T17:28:55.216Z
Marked the task request_store | ~> 1.2.0 | 1.3.0-1 - WIP @sudheeshshetty as completed
By Sudheeshshetty on 2016-04-01T16:16:25.703Z
taking request-store
By Praveen Arimbrathodiyil on 2016-03-31T16:36:18.205Z
Everyone please doublecheck upstream Gemfile.lock for 8.6.x for exact versions as our tracker can't automate this because of a rubygems.org api bug. Ignore act* as its from rails.